Towards SHACL 1.2
Hi everyone, with RDF 1.2 on the horizon, there has been renewed interest in working towards a new official SHACL release. In particular, SHACL should be extended to support new RDF features such as...
View ArticleMisusing shacl for sparql examples?
Hi All, I have a question, we at SIB kinda misuse shacl to represent our query examples. This started with the UniProt sparql endpoint and spread to others and we are considering this as an internal...
View ArticleExtending VoID dataset descriptions with ShACL shapePartitions
Hi All, We are big users of void and currently provide a lot of statistics for datasets like UniProt using this vocabulary, both on ftp and in our sparql service description. Significantly detailed...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Invitation to Breakout on "Schemata Discussion - Follow up from TPAC23"
Dear SHACL CG Participants, In the scope of the Breakout Day organized by the W3C, as a part of the WoT WG/IG I am organizing a breakout session that I think would be relevant to some of you. The...
View ArticleDriving JSON-LD framing specs from SHACL model
Hello SHACL & JSON-LD lovers I have SHACL specs. I also have APIs that return JSON-LD. The JSON-LD is built from RDF using a manually maintained context + JSON-LD framing specs. My question is how...
View ArticleSHACL to SPARQL
Hi all, I have a library which generates SPARQL queries from SHACL, mostly to support two use cases. The first is listing sets of items, or focus nodes, with constraints on which items are selected. I...
View ArticleProfiling of SHACL ontologies
Dear SHACL CG, One of the deliverables of the proposed "Data Shapes WG" [1] is a "SHACL 1.2 Profiling" specification. The intention is to "define methods for using SHACL to create formal profiles of...
View ArticleSHACL with RDF Datasets
Hi all, I'm wondering whether there's been any new thoughts or development to this[original email](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-shacl/2019Jul/0003.html)around extending SHACL to work...
View ArticleCall for Participation: Data Shapes Working Group Charter Approved; Join the...
Dear All, I am forwarding this announcement to the group's primary public mailing list to notify the group of the approval of the charter for the Data Shapes Working Group and call for participation....
View ArticleClosing the SHACL Community Group
Hi all, As announced yesterday [1], the Data Shapes Working Group is now rechartered to maintain the SHACL specifications on the W3C Recommendation track. The group will continue to work publicly, on...
View ArticleCustom sh:rule to support references to other shapes, and other features
Hi, I'm new to this group and am looking for some help. I also just joined the SHACL Community Group. We want to use SHACL to validate data and to infer new triples. We think we need to implement a...
View ArticleThe new Data Shapes WG - invitation
Dear SHACL CG, As you may be aware from official W3C emails and announcements, the Data Shapes WG #2 has been approved and this Community Group will close as the two groups cover the same territory of...
View Article